Frequently Asked Questions Dealing With The Bible 1

What is the best way to get right with God if I am Jewish?

You probably know that in the Tanakh (Old Testament) the only way to get right with God was to obey all the laws (the Ten Commandments and a whole lot more) perfectly for your entire life. Unfortunately, we cannot obey all the Old Testament laws—it simply is not possible—yet with God, we have to obey them all to be right with Him. So, now we had a problem. Being Jewish, you probably know that in the Old Testament the temporary solution to this were the many sacrifices—a way to push back our sins—but an inadequate way to “pay” for our sins. Still, the focus was always looking forward to the “perfect” sacrifice of the Messiah or Savior. We now know that this is Jesus. There are over 300 prophecies about the Messiah in the Old Testament, all of which had to be fulfilled by the Messiah, and Jesus fulfilled all of them. The mathematical probabilities alone prove that only Jesus can be the Messiah.
Since we can’t keep all the laws of God perfectly, God set it up through Jesus and His perfect life that we could have a relationship with God. In other words, we could get right with God through Jesus. Now, having that relationship with God through His Son Jesus, we learn and grow to be “like Jesus” in the way that we live our life—we become more godly as an outgrowth of our relationship. It's a little like if you have a boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, or wife—because of your feelings for them, you will want to please them and make them happy.
As far as being Jewish, the way for you to get right with God is the same as every other person on the planet—you need Jesus (John chapter 14 verse 6 and Acts chapter 4 verse 12).
Following the One, True God is an amazing experience. You come from a rich heritage that at times did just that and in the process changed their world. We hope you will do the same.
What is the meaning of “third heaven” in 2 Corinthians 12:2?

The Bible refers to three “heavens.” We learn in Genesis chapter 1 verses 6 and 7 that God created the firmament. He called this firmament “heaven” in verse 8. The Sun and Moon were placed in part of it (verses 16 to 18), and birds fly in another part (verse 20). We would typically refer to these “two heavens” as outer space and our atmosphere. The third heaven (referred to in 2 Corinthians chapter 12 verses 2-4 among other places), would be the spiritual realm where God and the angels reside.

What is Purgatory?
Purgatory is a teaching of the Catholic church. Their description of it can be found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church Part One, Section Two, Chapter Three, Article 12 - I BELIEVE IN LIFE EVERLASTING.
    1030 All who die in God’s grace and friendship, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven. 1031 The Church gives the name Purgatory to this final purification of the elect, which is entirely different from the punishment of the damned. The Church formulated her doctrine of faith on Purgatory especially at the councils of Florence and Trent. The tradition of the Church, by reference to certain texts of Scripture, speaks of a cleansing fire:605
The superscript 605 refers to the “certain texts of Scripture” statement earlier in that sentence: 1 Corinthians chapter 3 verse 15, and 1 Peter chapter 1 verse 7. However, reading these verses in context reveals that they have nothing to do with the concept of Purgatory. Take a look:
    1 Corinthians 3 9 For we are God’s fellow workers; you are God’s field, you are God’s building. 10 According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder I have laid the foundation, and another builds on it. But let each one take heed how he builds on it. 11 For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12 Now if anyone builds on this foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, 13 each one’s work will become clear; for the Day will declare it, because it will be revealed by fire; and the fire will test each one’s work, of what sort it is. 14 If anyone’s work which he has built on it endures, he will receive a reward. 15 If anyone’s work is burned, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.
    1 Peter 1 6 In this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while, if need be, you have been grieved by various trials, 7 that the genuineness of your faith, being much more precious than gold that perishes, though it is tested by fire, may be found to praise, honor, and glory at the revelation of Jesus Christ, 8 whom having not seen you love. Though now you do not see Him, yet believing, you rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory, 9 receiving the end of your faith—the salvation of your souls.
Notice that 1 Corinthians 3:15 refers to the testing of each person’s “spiritual work.” That is, if people do something that they think will get them “bonus points” in heaven, they may later discover that those actions were worthless and will become “burned up” (like rubbish). This obviously has nothing to do with people undergoing purification to achieve holiness.
The passage in 1 Peter refers to the Christian persecution that was going on when Peter wrote that epistle. It has to do with the trials of living people on this Earth, not an afterlife purification.
These “certain texts of Scripture” do not support Purgatory—and even the concept of Purgatory is in sharp conflict with many Bible teachings like Romans 6:23 and Ephesians 2:8. The Bible clearly states that our salvation is a completed free gift, which we receive when we “get right with God through Jesus”—not something that requires an additional purification step.
What is meant by Abraham’s Bosom in Luke 16:23?

Abraham’s Bosom, also translated “Abraham’s side” or “Paradise,” is one of two compartments for the dead, within something referred to by the Greek word hades. One compartment is a side of reward. It is called Abraham’s Bosom, since this would have been a blissful vision to the Jewish audience to whom Jesus was telling this story in Luke chapter 16. (Abraham, the “father of the Jews” through his grandson Jacob, was revered by the Jewish community.) The other compartment is a side of punishment. It does not have a special name and is also referred to by the name hades, which can be a little confusing.
Some theologians believe that during the days between Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection that He went to hades (referred to in 1 Peter chapter 3, verses 18 and 19 for example) to do two things:
  • To tell those in the “punishment compartment” that He won His battle with Satan
  • To take the people in the “reward compartment” to heaven
Although this theory does not contradict the Bible, the evidence is weak:
  • The logic supporting this viewpoint looks like this: We know from 2 Corinthians chapter 5 verse 8 that when people who have gotten right with God die, they are “present with the Lord.” We also know that after His resurrection, Jesus took his place at the right hand of God (see Acts chapter 7 verses 55 and 56, and Hebrews chapter 1 verse 3). Therefore, if we are to be present with the Lord who is in at God’s right hand in heaven, we will have to go straight to heaven.
  • Still, evidence against the “emptied paradise theory” appears in the book of Ephesians. Referring to people who have gotten right with God and still living on earth, Ephesians chapter 2, verse 6 states that God “raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.” If living people can be considered (at least spiritually) already seated in heavenly places, the phrase “present with the Lord” in 2 Corinthians 5:8 may not mean actually residing in heaven.
If the “emptied paradise theory” is true, Abraham’s Bosom would have been a holding place for those who had gotten right with God prior to Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross. After that time, those who get right with God go directly to heaven when they die.
If the theory is not true, people who have gotten right with God are still going to paradise when they die. They will go to heaven later, during the translation of the Church where “the dead in Christ will rise first” (see 1 Thessalonians chapter 4, verses 13-18).
Whether the “emptied paradise theory” is true or not, the “punishment” section of hades is still in use. Everyone who has gone there has not moved, and is awaiting their final punishment in hell—along with those who are currently joining them.
If you ask Jesus into your heart, then drift away and die before you repent, will you still go to heaven?
Many people ask this question, especially after reading Hebrews 6:4-6 (below).
    Hebrews 6 4 For it is* impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
    * Words in italic type have been added by the New King James Version for clarity. They are not found in the original Hebrew. This is a standard feature found in many Bibles, starting with the Geneva Bible in 1560 A.D.
Notice how the passage says that for one who falls away it is impossible to be brought back to repentance. Stated the other way around, this verse says that not being repentant is a sign that people have fallen away. Therefore, this passage applies to those who stray so far away from God and Jesus that they do not want to come back.
Asking a question like “If you ask Jesus into your heart, then drift away and die before you repent, will you still go to heaven?” sounds like the question of someone who still wants to come back to God and go to heaven. If you want to change your ways (repent), you have proof that you have not fallen away and that the verse does not apply (now). You just need to start behaving as you know you should—again.
All of us drift a little from time to time—although some of us are a little “driftier” than others smile. Remember, our salvation is not based on how good or bad we are, but on getting right with God, Christ’s goodness, His sacrifice, and our acceptance of His authority in our lives.
Will a child born out of wedlock go to heaven?
Whether someone’s parents sinned or not has little to do with whether a person goes to heaven or hell. Judgment for the child being born out of wedlock will rest on the parents who committed the sin. If the child dies before the age of accountability, it will go to heaven.  Once past the age of accountability, the child will have to make his or her own choice whether or not to accept Jesus as their savior. That will then determine whether the child will go to heaven or not. Ezekiel chapter 18 teaches us about many of these situations. A key for this question is verse 20, which states:
    The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.
Can any sin be forgiven?
There are at least three passages in the Bible that teach us that all but one sin can be forgiven. Matthew 12:31,32 and Mark 3:28,29 are two of these passages. For illustration, here is the third passage, spoken by Jesus in the book of Luke:
    Luke 12 8 “Also I say to you, whoever confesses Me before men, him the Son of Man also will confess before the angels of God. 9 But he who denies Me before men will be denied before the angels of God. 10 “And anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but to him who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven.”
The interesting thing about these passages is that forgiveness is not automatic. Each person has to accept Jesus Christ as Savior, repent (turn away from and sincerely attempt to never repeat any of their sins) and acknowledge Jesus Christ as their savior to other people before their sins can be forgiven. (Matthew 10:32,33 also reveals this.) Of course, the Bible always places belief and baptism together, so we know that each person must be baptized also.
Many scholars have debated what “blasphemes against the Holy Spirit” means. It should become clear when you read the passage in Matthew chapter 12, verses 22-32. It is not an “accidental” sin. The Pharisees who were guilty of this sin had just witnessed a genuine miracle of God—Jesus gave speech and sight to a man who was mute and blind. Since the Pharisees rejected Jesus’ authority, they attributed Jesus’ miracles to Satan, rather than God—an unbelievably wicked sin. A sin of this magnitude would be unforgivable. Since such miracles do not take place any more (in spite of the claims of some “faith healers”), it should make sense that committing a sin of this type would be almost impossible to do these days.
Will a homosexual go to hell?
The answer to this question is contained in the book of 1 Corinthians.
    1 Corinthians 6 9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
It is obvious that a person can be forgiven of most any sin, as we just explained in the previous question. Yet, people still need to repent (turn from their previous sinful behavior) and stop sinning. If a person refuses to give up a sin such as lying or adultery, they are really saying “I will not give up anything for Christ, even though He gave his life for me.” For example, if a married person told their spouse that they loved them and then cheated on them each week, would you believe that they really loved their spouse? It would be obvious to anyone that there was no real love involved. Similarly, God will not believe someone who claims to be a Christian and who says they accept Christ, who also refuses to give up any former sin.
What happens to small children who have died before they have accepted Christ?
When Jesus walked the Earth, He showed his love for kids and stated that people needed to be like them to be suitable for heaven. See Matthew 18:1-14* (an awesome passage). Notice what Jesus says:
  • “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.”
  • “Take heed that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that in heaven their angels always see the face of My Father who is in heaven.”
  • “Even so it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish.”
The message is clear that children have a special “connection” to God through angels. Although not directly stated, from these and other verses it is apparent that any children who die before they reach the age of accountability will go to heaven. “Does a person’s age make a difference?”
*Special note: Some of the wording in the Matthew 18:1-14 passage can be puzzling, so we are adding this note to remove any confusion. The point of this passage is that people should turn from evil and do good. If they do not, they will end up in eternal fire (hell), which is so bad that people would be willing to chop off a hand to stay out of it. (An earthly example would be a coyote caught in a trap that will gnaw its foot off, rather than remain trapped. It did not like the idea of gnawing its foot off, it merely preferred doing that to being caught.) Therefore, we see that Jesus does not want us to mutilate ourselves, He wants us to turn from sin at all costs.
Will people who are insane (or handicapped mentally) go to heaven if they sin?
Psalm 116, verse 6 tells us that the LORD preserves the simple. Such people never reach the “age of accountability” mentally, so it makes sense that they will be treated like children. Children who die before they reach the age of accountability go to heaven, as we explained in the previous question.
There are exceptions, however. Some references in the Bible refer to people who were insane because they were possessed by demons. Mark chapter 5, verses 1-20 is one example. Notice how once the demons were driven out that this person wanted to follow Jesus (verse 18) and Jesus “saved” him (verse 19). It is plain that even if someone was driven insane by demons (pretty unlikely today) that once the demons were driven off, the person can be “saved” like anyone else and go to heaven. The key, then and now, is Jesus’ intervention.
What if someone lives their whole life and never hears about God, Jesus, or the Bible?

Are they still responsible for how they live?

Romans 1:18-20 and 2:14-16 say that God has given people a sense within. We call it our conscience. This passage in Romans also tells us that through nature God has made Himself evident to everyone. (If you ever looked into the sky at night and wondered where the universe stops, you get the idea.) This tells us that even the person who never specifically hears about God, Jesus, or the Bible has an inner sense of right and wrong and therefore has a responsibility to choose doing the right thing, based on their conscience and their sense of inner truth.

Is there a way for them to go to heaven?

To address this question, let’s check two “levels” of exposure to God, Jesus, and the Bible.
Level 1: Never Heard Anything
In today’s world there are really not that many people who do not have some exposure to Christianity. There are many who did not care about or pay attention to what they heard (such as a Buddhist in China) but that is not the same thing.
That said, let’s suppose that someone in a remote jungle tribe who never heard of Jesus knew that it was wrong to commit adultery and went ahead and did it. Let’s also say that they felt guilty about it later. If at that time a Christian missionary came by, would that person’s guilt cause them to turn completely from their previous ways (repent) and accept Jesus? God, who can understand every person’s thoughts and motives,* knows whether they would or not. If they would repent, it makes sense that this person will go to heaven—even if the missionary did not show up. (Assuming they do not fall back into bad behavior, of course.) This is also consistent with God’s character, who desires that all be saved (1 Timothy 2:1-4). However, if they would not repent even though they felt guilty, it makes sense that this person would not enter heaven.
* 1 Chronicles 28:9 and Hebrews 4:12,13 are examples.
What about a similar person who woke up the next day not caring about what they did—or even wanting to do it again? Would someone who was not sorry for their actions repent and accept Jesus if a missionary came by and told him about God, Jesus, and the Bible? Probably not. Most likely, they would continue acting against their conscience, which would keep them from entering heaven. (See Romans 1:18-20 and 2:14-16.)
Level 2: Only Heard the Old Testament
People who lived before Christ did not have the ability to accept Jesus Christ as their Savior. Yet, a way to get to heaven was available to them. The book of Deuteronomy, starting in chapter 11 (written before 1400 BC to eyewitnesses of God’s miracles) is a good but lengthy summary of what was involved. However, just like today, not everyone chose to follow God’s message. For an example, read the story of the rich man and Lazarus in Luke chapter 16, verses 19-31.
Notice in that story how the rich man asked Abraham to have Lazarus rise from the dead to warn his brothers? He implied that just reading the Old Testament (literally called “Moses and the Prophets”) was not enough. The rich man’s problem was the same as the “non-repentant” jungle man in the example above. The rich man had as much information as Lazarus did, but unlike Lazarus he ended up in Hades because of his desire to do what he knew was wrong. Further, he knew his brothers would be the same.
People who are indifferent (or callous in their thinking) are tough to convince, regardless of how much proof they are given. Read Matthew 11:20-24 for example. Notice that these people had the Old Testament, saw Jesus in person, and watched Him perform miracles. According to the rich man in the previous story, a miracle (of someone rising from the dead) would have been enough to convince these people to change their minds. Yet, we learn that miracles were not enough proof for these folks—they still rejected Jesus’ message.
Ironically, almost as though He was answering the rich man’s request, Jesus later rose from the dead—and physically ascended into heaven in front of many eyewitnesses (Acts chapter 1, verses 3-11). Still, there are many people today who say they do not have enough proof to accept Jesus as their Savior. Some things never change.
Doesn’t Mark 16:16 say that whoever does not believe in Jesus will be condemned? Wouldn’t the uneducated man in a remote jungle tribe fall into that category?

Mark 16:15-18 is similar to “the Great Commission” recorded in Matthew 28:18-20. Starting in verse 15, Jesus tells his eleven apostles to preach the good news (the plan of salvation). In verse 16, Jesus says that anyone they talk with who accepts this plan of salvation and gets baptized will be saved (go to heaven). However, those who they talk with who do not accept this plan of salvation (and subsequently will not get baptized) will be condemned. It is very clear that this passage applies to people who have been “talked to” and heard of God, Jesus, and the plan of salvation through Jesus’ disciples. That is, once a person is “talked to,” the person is no longer “uneducated” and the passage starting in Mark 16:15 applies.
However, if some people in a remote jungle tribe never hear the good news, how can they accept Jesus and be saved? They can not, because they would not have a clue who Jesus is or any of the rest of the process. Under those conditions, the passage starting in Mark 16:15 would not apply.
If everyone who is saved goes to heaven, who will be on Earth for Satan to deceive when he is let loose again in Rev 20:7?
Going to heaven is a matter of timing. People do not go directly to heaven when they are saved. Otherwise, when someone is baptized into Christ, they would disappear! Saved people go to heaven after they die. There will be plenty of people alive on Earth, saved and unsaved, when Satan is let out of prison at the end of the “thousand years.”
The Bible says that God does not change, so why do we find places where God changes His plan for people? What about Genesis 6:6 where God grieved that He had even made man?
This is explained by describing three of God’s different “plans.” We will address Genesis 6:6 between the second and third plans, since it fits there logically.
The First Type of Plan
When God makes an unconditional promise, usually something like “make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky” (as in Genesis 22:17,18) the promise always come true. The results are what God stated they would be. In this case it is obvious that God is not changing His character or changing His plan. You can tell this is an unconditional promise because God swears by the highest authority available—Himself (Genesis 22:16).
The Second Type of Plan
The second plan is based on a conditional promise from God—that is, something based on the people’s behavior. This applies to entire nations, smaller groups of people, or individuals (depending on who the subject is at the time). A great example of a conditional promise is Deuteronomy 28 where the blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience take up the whole chapter. In this case, the people of Israel chose to follow the “disobedience path” and God did not change, but kept his end of the bargain by delivering the curses He promised!
The Genesis 6:6 Issue
Genesis 6:1-6 is a passage dealing with “the sons of God” and their interaction with human women. From the text, any reader can see that “the sons of God” are not humans. (For example, it would not be unusual for humans to marry the “daughters of men.”)
The only rational interpretation of this passage is that “the sons of God” are angels that came down to earth, attracted by the human women. Since angels do not marry (Matthew 22:30) we know these angels (who rejected the marriage restriction) are not good angels, but bad ones—also known as demons. Now imagine what kind of person a half human/half demon would be like. Very powerful, very intelligent, and completely evil. This is what Genesis 6:4,5 describes. It is at that point that “the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.” This is not a situation where God changed His character or His plan, it is a situation where God is sorry (sad) that his beautifully created human race has been corrupted. A poor analogy would be buying a new car, and then having someone back their car into yours in a parking lot. You may regret buying the new car, not because you changed your mind, but because you are grieved by the damage.
The Third Type of Plan
You will notice that God is quite fearsome in the Old Testament (a common penalty for many sins was death), yet God is a “daddy” in the New Testament (Romans 8:15). The difference, of course, was another of God’s plans—salvation through Jesus Christ. This third plan is part unconditional and part conditional.
The unconditional part is that God said He would provide a means of salvation. Do you remember the words “In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed” from Genesis 22:18? Salvation through Jesus Christ was what God was talking about in this earlier unconditional promise. (Galatians 3:16 explains the situation.)
The conditional part of this promise is based on our free will (free choice). The Bible clearly states that any person who rejects God’s Son, Jesus, will go to hell. However, if a person (even a “bad” person) believes in and puts their faith in Jesus, turns from their sins (repents), confesses Jesus as their Lord, and gets baptized—God will accept that person through His Son. Does this mean God changed His mind about that person? No, it means that the person has accepted God’s conditional promise of salvation. When the person does their part, using their own free will, God does His part. God is not changing His character or His plan, He is keeping His end of the agreement..

What the Bible Says About Divorce and Remarriage

Is Any Divorce Acceptable?

In a general sense, God allows only three reasons for the dissolution of a marriage.
  • The first reason is obvious—death of one of the individuals in the marriage. See Romans chapter 7, verse 2 (Romans 7:2).
  • The second reason is adultery or immorality on the part of one of the individuals (Matthew 5:31,32 19:9, and so forth).
  • The third reason appears in First Corinthians 7:12-16. (Note that when Paul wrote “I say, not the Lord” in that passage, he did not say that this was not from God, but rather that Jesus had never addressed this topic Himself.) Here Paul states that “if the unbeliever departs” the Christian is not “under bondage.” The same concept is used again in verse 39 where the clear context of being “under bondage” was that you could not remarry. As a rule of hermeneutics, you allow the author to define the terms by what is stated in other areas of the same document. This is the author’s intended meaning. Thus, a Christian is not bound to their marriage if the unbeliever leaves them.
In each of these cases, it seems that God is trying to protect the innocent party that is left to live their life after the marriage ends. Please understand that this is a brief treatment of this subject.
Now let’s look at a situation that does not include one of these “acceptable” divorces. Many people do believe that remarriage after such a divorce constitutes continuous adultery that cannot be repented of (if you remain in the marriage). They would say that these people should divorce again and either be reunited to their original spouse or remain single. They would cite Romans 7:3 as a proof of this position. It is a possible position to take. (Still, remarriage to the same spouse after being married to someone else in between violates Deuteronomy 24:4.)
It is important to note that Romans 7:3 was not designed by Paul to be the “end all” statement of divorce and remarriage, it was actually using marriage in general to illustrate a point about the Law. Obviously God did provide for marriage to end in two other ways besides death. This is not to say that God is soft on divorce. Jesus said that it was only because of our “hardness of heart” that God allowed divorce (Matthew 19:8 and others). Ezra chapters 9 and 10 are sometimes used to support getting a divorce to obey God. However, the reason for divorce in these chapters was to keep the Jewish people pure for the Messiah to come through their lineage. (They had intermarried with those other than Jews, which was in direct violation of God’s commandment to them.) The situation was very different from our situation today. Malachi 2:16 says that God hates divorce, and we think everyone knows that divorce is wrong before God.

How About Remarriage?

The real issue that people wonder about is remarriage. Although God has not given specific information regarding the acceptability of remarriage, we can give you some things to think about in this area. Obviously, based on 2 Corinthians 5:17, if someone has had a failed marriage, and later got right with God, “all things are done away with”—you get a clean slate as though you had not been divorced. There are certain passages like Romans 8:28 that show that God can use bad stuff that happened in our life to do good stuff. The “prodigal son” of Luke chapter 15 certainly shows someone who walked away from all that was good, messed up his life, and then repented and came back. While there were repercussions for his failures, he was still reinstated as a son. In the book of Joel, a terrible swarm of locusts had devastated the land as a judgment brought on them for their sin. But God then promised that He would “give back the years that the locusts have eaten.”

Summing Things Up

So, how do we summarize? If both partners had a divorce for one of the three “acceptable” reasons, they are free to remarry. If not, things become less clear. We have always believed that God is the God of the future. While people certainly need to take responsibility for what they have done wrong and the consequences that a divorce brought against them, we have to believe that true repentance can right such a wrong before God. It is hard to believe that people are useless to God and unacceptable to Him because of this past failure. Further, it just does not seem consistent with what we read in the Bible about God. However, we must emphasize that this is our opinion. Each person must decide this for themselves based on what the Bible says.

Frequently Asked Questions Dealing With The Bible

Did Mary have children after Jesus?

Yes, Mary bore children after Jesus, a fact that is stated several places in the Bible. One good example is in Matthew chapter 13, verses 55 and 56, where some of Jesus’ critics cited His “earthly” characteristics as a way of “proving” that He was not the Son of God. Here is the entire passage, so you can see the context.
54 And when He had come to His own country, He taught them in their synagogue, so that they were astonished and said, “Where did this Man get this wisdom and these mighty works?
55 “Is this not the carpenter’s son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, Joses, Simon, and Judas?
56 “And His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this Man get all these things?"
57 So they were offended at Him. But Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor except in his own country and in his own house.”
This passage clearly reveals that these are real brothers and sisters (that is, half-brothers and half-sisters) of Jesus; and children of Mary. Some people try to explain Jesus’ brothers and sisters as being “spiritual” brothers and sisters. However, this is clearly and plainly not correct. Incidentally, James and Judas (Jude) are the authors of the two New Testament Bible books of those names.
ball I read at another site that the NIV bible is perverse and wrong. Is that true?

Although we agree that the NIV Bible is not the most accurate, to say it is perverse and wrong is an overreaction. (Referring to God's Word, the Bible, as “perverse and wrong” may even be a sin in itself if you think about it.) As long as you realize the NIV is not a perfect translation, you should be OK. To get a more precise meaning of specific passages or words, you can consider using a concordance to determine the original words.
ball Isn’t Yeshua the correct spelling for Jesus’ name? I heard the name Jesus came about from a bad translation.

The name, as written in the original Greek is “Iesous,” which is pronounced “ee-ay-sooce’” This was later modified to “Iesus” in Latin, which was the common language of the time. Early English Bibles such as the Coverdale, Geneva, Bishops, and the 1611 King James Version all used the “Iesus” spelling. It was only in 1629 that “Jesus” was chosen to represent the phonics of this name in English, since the language was changing. (You can see many other “strange” spellings in the older Bibles.)
Additionally, a few old Bible manuscripts written in Greek translated the Hebrew name “Y@howshuwa’” (Joshua) as “Iesous,” in the Old Testament. Perhaps that was a poor choice, since the name then matched the name Iesous (Jesus) in the New Testament and seemed to establish a connection that did not exist.
ball What is the most accurate English translation of the Greek (New Testament) text?

Before answering, we should state that today’s “Greek text” is a published text that scholars believe best represents the original New Testament text. It is based on their examination of the known Greek manuscripts. (Manuscripts are the handwritten books or scrolls produced before the invention of the printing press.) For the last 120 years, scholars have been divided into two “camps” regarding what the true Greek text is. Therefore, the “key” to your question is “which Greek text?”
Based on our research (hundreds of hours, thousands of pages read, classes attended) the best Greek text is the Textus Receptus. Although it contains a few debatable words, it is overall the “best” Greek text. The most accurate English translation of this New Testament text is the New King James Version. The other Greek text is often called the Critical Text. It is based on a text proposed by Westcott and Hort in 1881. Although the Critical Text has changed substantially since Westcott and Hort first wrote their theories, this Greek text “type” has become the most popular. The most accurate English translation of this New Testament text is the New American Standard.
ball Jesus told His apostles that some of them would be alive when He comes into His kingdom. What did He mean?

Many people have wondered what Jesus meant in Matthew 16:28 when He said, “Assuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” Most of the confusion stems from the belief that Jesus is referring to his Second Coming, which He is not. Bible scholars generally adopt one of two common interpretations for this verse:
i The first interpretation states that Jesus is referring to the Transfiguration that occurs in Matthew chapter 17. The supporting evidence is:
  • Claims that Peter gave it this interpretation in 2 Peter 1:16-18.
  • Since three of the twelve apostles saw it (Peter, James, and John), they interpret them as Jesus’ reference to “some standing here.”
  • All three synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) place the Transfiguration immediately after Jesus’ prediction.
First, it is unclear that Peter is really referring to Jesus’ kingdom in 2 Peter 1:16-18. A more straightforward meaning of verses 16-18 is the simple interpretation: Peter states that he was an eyewitness to Jesus’ majesty, and is therefore reporting the truth, not just repeating fables he heard from other people. (This could possibly be a defense against the accusations of some false teachers.) It is also unclear how Jesus “comes into His kingdom” through the Transfiguration. Finally, the phrase “there are some standing here who shall not taste death” does not seem that impressive for an event that follows less than a week later. Overall, this first interpretation is unsatisfactory.
ii The second interpretation is that Jesus is referring to the events following His death, burial, and resurrection. These events include:
  • Jesus becoming our Savior and being exalted to the right hand of God (for one example, see Acts chapter 2 verses 32 and 33).
  • The apostles became bold (finally), preached how to get right with God through Jesus, and started the Church (see Acts chapter 2).
  • People who were not Jews could get right with God through Jesus (see Acts chapter 10 and beyond).
These events more clearly mark the worldwide coming of Jesus’ kingdom. We believe that this second interpretation is much more satisfactory.
ball Who committed suicide in the Bible?

The Bible records seven suicides. They are:
  • Abimelech (Judges 9:54), which might not be considered a true suicide, since he was probably mortally wounded already.
  • Samson (Judges 16:30)
  • King Saul (1 Samuel 31:4)
  • Saul’s armorbearer (1 Samuel 31:5)
  • Ahithophel (2 Samuel 17:23)
  • Zimri (1 Kings 16:18)
  • Judas (Matthew 27:3-5)
ball Why does the Catholic Bible have more books in it?

These extra books appear in the Old Testament of the Catholic Bible and are called the “Apocrypha.” They were not generally accepted as part of the Bible’s “canon” (list of included books) until the Council of Trent (a Catholic council held between December 13, 1545, and December 4, 1563). At that time, the council pronounced the Vulgate translated by St. Jerome to be the “official” Catholic Bible. (Jerome’s Vulgate was a Latin version of the Bible that included these extra books.) Since the Council of Trent, all Catholic editions of the Bible have included the Apocrypha.
However, we know from the writings of Josephus (A.D. 37-c.100) that no book was added to the Hebrew scriptures after the time of Artaxerxes who reigned after Xerxes. Therefore, we know the Old Testament was completed by 424 B.C. and has not changed since that time. The Apocrypha were written centuries later. For that reason and others, most Protestants did not accept adding the Apocrypha to the Bible canon during the Council of Trent. They did not necessarily believe that these extra books were “bad,” they just knew that they did not belong in the Bible. The Old Testament of most Bibles printed today follow the original Hebrew canon, matching the Jewish Tanakh (the scriptures used by the Jewish religion).

ball I heard that the bible as we know it was compiled about the year 300. Who decided what was put in and what was not?

What follows is a brief discussion of a topic that has filled many books. Identifying which Scriptures deserve to be considered sacred refers to a list known as the “canon.” Canon is a term derived from the Greek word kanon, which was based on the Hebrew word qaneh—a reed or cane. Since a reed was sometimes used as a measuring rod, the term came to mean a standard or rule.Perhaps the most concise answer to this question comes from The Nelson Study Bible:
“A book is not inspired because it is declared to be canonical but is canonical because it is considered inspired. Therefore, the church discovered the canonicity of the Old and New Testament books, it did not determine or cause their canonicity.”
The term “discovered” is a key. Investigation into this subject reveals that the criteria for determining if a book belongs in the Bible was not made up beforehand and applied to a variety of “religious” writings. Rather, the criteria evolved from a description of those books that Christians (and the Jews before them) already knew belonged in the Bible. Here is a typical list taken from The Nelson Study Bible:
  • Was the book written by a prophet (or apostle) of God?
  • Did miraculous signs or accuracy of fulfillment serve as confirmation of the prophet’s message?
  • Is the book internally consistent with the revelation of God found in the teachings of other canonical books, especially what God gave through Moses?
An analogy to discovering the canon would be Sir Isaac Newton’s “discovery” of the law of universal gravitation (published in 1686). Newton did not actually discover gravity. He merely defined more precisely what everyone knew all along.

ball Can you explain the Bible codes?

Stated simply, “Bible codes” are generated by a computer program that selects (for example) every 50th character in the Hebrew text of the Old Testament, and examines these “sequences” to see if they spell something. Since words sometimes appear in these sequences, those who find them claim that it reveals messages hidden in the Bible’s text.
Stated bluntly, we do not believe that the Bible codes are “real” for at least three reasons:
  • The Bible itself states that God made his messages clear. Deuteronomy 30:11-14 is one of many examples. Something that requires a computer could not reasonably be called “clear.”
  • A popular “Bible Code” book states that put together as one string without spaces, the Old Testament is 304,805 characters long. If the original (“autograph”) copy of the Bible text differs by one character, the “hidden messages” would be wrong, because the sequences would change. Although we do believe that the message of the Bible is accurate and true, we are not confident that these folks have correctly defined every one of the 304,805 characters and placed them in perfect order.
  • If God intended to put codes in the Bible, there would be a lot more of them than the few scattered phrases people find using the Bible code computer program.
We understand that some well-meaning people believe that these codes and their hidden messages offer further proof that the Bible is accurate. Unfortunately, this “proof” is no better than the similar arguments used to support the Qur’an. Predicting the future with 100% accuracy is a much stronger proof, one which no other “holy writing” besides the Bible achieves.
ball I read that there are many contradictions in the Bible. Is that true?

There are hundreds of these so-called contradictions listed on the Web. None of those we have seen are actually contradictions. We have explained many of them at the Clarifying Christianity site. All of these alleged Bible discrepancies have been explained in books. A good one is the Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties by Gleason L. Archer.
ball Where did Cain’s wife come from? Was it one of his sisters? What about Incest? Isn’t that against the laws of the Bible?

We all come from Adam and Eve, who had both sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4). Their children had no choice but to marry one another. If incest was prohibited then, humans would have lasted only one generation.
The first time that the Bible prohibits incest occurs during Moses’ lifetime (see Leviticus 20:11 and the following verses for an example). Prior to that time it was not a written law, so it is reasonable to assume that such marital relationships were accepted (but not endorsed) from Adam’s time until then. For example, Abraham (a man who followed God faithfully) married a half sister (see Genesis 20:12), something that was prohibited 400 years later (see Leviticus 20:17 and Deuteronomy 27:22).
The Bible does not include all of the details regarding who was related to who (or what their names were), since it puts together only a framework that shows God’s plan. As a result, some people are not named, or their specific relationships are ignored. This does not mean that they were not important, it just means that recording these facts was not essential to revealing God’s plan. The bible is long already. Adding these facts would make it the size of an encyclopedia. smile
Who Cain married was one of these unnamed people. She was probably a sister. The only other option would be that Cain waited for one of his brothers and sisters to marry and have a daughter that he could marry. Knowing what a teenager’s hormones are like makes that seem unlikely. Also, since there is no time period implied between Genesis 4 verses 16 and 17, we can assume that Cain was married at the time he killed Abel. There is nothing in the Bible record to indicate that a generation had passed when that happened, so the “marrying a sister” theory makes the most sense.
Summarizing, it is likely that Cain married a sister, but was not committing a sin in doing so because God allowed those unions in those times.
ball Do you know the name of Noah’s wife?

The Bible is silent regarding the name of Noah’s wife. There has been some speculation, though. In Genesis 4:22, a man named Lamech had a son named Tubal-Cain, whose sister was named Naamah. Also, in Genesis 5:28,29 another man, also named Lamech, is revealed to be Noah’s father. Since the Bible refers to Naamah (and perhaps because the two fathers had the same name), people speculate that she might have married Noah. Frankly, this evidence does not prove that Noah even knew Naamah.
Since the Bible names Noah’s three sons Shem, Ham and Japheth (as it named Noah), and since the son’s wives were not named (as Noah’s wife was not), it is more likely that Noah’s wife was not Naamah, but rather an anonymous, but virtuous woman.
ball Is there a passage in the bible about God turning a man black?

We are not aware of such a passage in the Bible. Some cults teach that the mark on Cain (Genesis 4:15) was turning him black, but there is no reason to believe this, based on the text. The original Hebrew word used for “mark” is ’owth, which means a “sign” or “token” and has nothing to do with changing the color of a person’s skin.
ball Who are the “144,000 from all the tribes of Israel” in Revelation chapter 7, verses 4-8?

We have heard many debates over who “the 144,000” are. Based on the Bible text, it makes sense that they are Jews who converted from Judaism to Christianity. That is, they will see the truth and finally become saved—becoming a special remnant God kept for Himself and fulfilling the statement that “the first will be last.”
This question typically comes from someone who has talked with a Jehovah’s Witness—a member of what was called the Watchtower Society prior to 1931 (when they changed their name). The Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that there is an elite group of 144,000 that will be in heaven with God. That much is true, as we wrote in the previous paragraph. What is false about their belief is that they claim that these 144,000 are all Jehovah’s Witnesses! (They used to say that the 144,000 was everyone who was a Jehovah’s Witness. To keep from limiting their expansion, they changed their story in 1931. Now they state that the chosen 144,000 will go to heaven and the people who became Jehovah’s Witnesses later will live on an earthly paradise.) The Bible does not support either version of their beliefs.
In the Bible, Jesus revealed where people went after death in Luke 16:19-31. His teaching contrasts sharply with the statements of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. He refers to Hades (imprecisely translated “hell” in some Bible versions) and a paradise referred to by the name “Abraham’s side” or “Abraham’s bosom.”
Hell was created for the devil (Satan) and his angels (demons), and people do not yet go there. Rev 20:13 tells us that Hades will give up its (unsaved) dead at that time—who will be thrown into the lake of fire (hell) two verses later in Rev 20:15. From these verses, it is apparent that the very unpleasant Hades described in Luke 16 is a sort of holding area for the unsaved dead, who will later go to hell.
What about the saved people? 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 tells us what will happen—the “saved” dead will be raised first. Then the living “saved” will join them. You will also notice that everyone goes to the same place—they will “always be with the Lord.” There is no “special group” of 144,000 separated out of these saved people.

Chinese Symbols Prove the Bible

Often when people struggle with questions of faith such as, "Is God real?" we as Christians don't know where to direct them except the Bible, which is our final authority.  When someone isn't even sure if God is real however, it may be hard for them to trust the Bible at that point.  Where else can we direct them then?  How about historical evidence?

Check out this site HERE that shows how the Bible can be proven through Chinese symbols.  This site claims that Chinese is the oldest language (possible not) but even so it is old, and Chinese write with symbols that have meaning rather than with letters that spell words.  Some of their symbols show creation, God, the fall of man, and much more that you will find in God's Word.  Very cool, so take a look!